“Nursing homes in Canada in general are likely the same. They certainly are in Ontario…appalling. Understaffed, horrible working conditions and getting worse. Pie-in-the-sky government run Ministry of Health and Long-term Care, paid to make rules and laws that are absolutely impossible to meet with the severe under funding and lack of adequate staffing.” Reader comment on: Class action accuses one of Canada’s biggest nursing-home companies of neglecting residents
I believe systemic neglect and abuse of elderly people who live with dementia in long-term care facilities is widespread in Canada and around the world. Care workers know about it, nursing home managers and administrators know about it, and some family members of those who are neglected and abused know about it too. Elder neglect and abuse remain pervasive and, worse yet, they are swept under the carpet.
Positive approach to dementia care advocates worldwide are fighting for person-centred care that engages people who live with dementia and helps them to live rich and full lives until the end. Research shows this type of care is essential to the well being of older people, particularly those living with dementia. Treating our elders in any other way is criminal.
Here are some of the factors that allow institutional neglect and abuse to continue:
1 ) Ageism & stigma
Ageist views remain widespread (e.g. old people are useless; their lives don’t matter; our job is to warehouse them, not engage them with life). These unhappy myths negatively impact the way we care for elderly people who live with dementia in their homes, in our communities and in long-term care facilities.
Many people misunderstand the realities of dementia and how it affects those who live with it. Some of the erroneous beliefs include: it doesn’t matter how we treat them; they don’t know what’s happening; they’ll forget in five minutes; they’re not “here” anymore; they don’t understand; they aren’t capable of anything; they are just empty shells; etc. These are myths not truths.
2 ) The biomedical model
Many medical professionals still subscribe to a biomedical model that characterizes dementia as a progressive, irreversible and fatal disease which is tragic, costly and burdensome. Proponents of the model see expressive behaviour as confused, purposeless, and disease driven, manageable only with medication and physical restraints. In fact, it’s proven that reducing the use of antipsychotic drugs in LTCFs increases the well-being of residents living with dementia. The biomedical perspective is dangerous, antiquated and out of step with the reality and the needs of people who live with dementia (PWLD). We must adopt more sophisticated and compassionate approaches that put people at the top of the care pyramid or at the centre of the care circle.
3 ) Poor leadership
Senior executives and medical professionals who manage LTCFs are responsible in large part for most of the factors that follow and for the neglect and abuse that result. Being willing to take a hard look at what has been wrong and what is wrong with failing eldercare organizations and systems takes courage. Identifying shortcomings and fixing them is a gargantuan task that takes vision, will, energy and commitment. If those kinds of people were in leadership positions now, we wouldn’t find ourselves with the existing situation: broken facilities full of broken people.
4 ) Lack of training/understanding
The standard of care in any given facility is only as good as the front line workers who deliver it. Dementia care requires specialized training and understanding; if care workers don’t have the skills they need, neglect and abuse are inevitable. Frontline care staff need the encouragement and support of competent, compassionate, visionary leaders to get the job done.
5 ) Low staff-to-resident ratios
How can one care worker attend to the needs of eight to ten or even more PLWD and do it to a reasonable standard? It’s not possible. And yet, those are the kinds of care worker to resident ratios that prevail in most LTCF. It’s no wonder neglect and abuse are pervasive.
6 ) Warehouse-like environments
There have been recent innovations in design including dementia villages, small group homes, and facilities in which childcare and eldercare are combined. While these approaches have proven successful, organizations that apply them are still relatively few and far between. Most facilities are not designed to meet resident needs, but rather to maximize operational efficiency. Calling a warehouse a “village,” a “manor,” or a “specialized memory care unit,” does not change the essence of what it is.
7 ) Dis-incentivized workers
Care workers tend to be poorly trained and poorly paid, and overworked because of low staff to resident ratios; they are often ill treated, and unappreciated. Further, because they are not properly trained and don’t have the skills they require to interact effectively with PLWD, they tend to produce instead of reduce challenging behavioural expressions that wouldn’t be there if there were more staff, better training, better understanding, suitable environments, engaging activities, etc. It’s a vicious circle.
8 ) NONcare cultures
All of the factors above lead to UNcare cultures in which profit come first, people come last and the status quo is never questioned, or, if and when it is, complainers and whistleblowers are quickly silenced, dismissed, or disavowed. Staff become demoralized, complacent, cynical and hardened to preserve their own sanity. Negative UNcare culture that has become entrenched is hard to change.
9 ) Few “police;” small “sticks”
Regulatory bodies may be stretched beyond capacity. Substandard operations/practices may be difficult to identify because of the way inspections are done (e.g. prior notice of visits results in things being “spit and polish” for inspecting eyes), and offending institutions may remain open and operating despite substandard performance and long lists of regulation breaches and/or regulatory infractions.
10 ) The bottom line
Cost-saving, cost-cutting, and the pursuit of profit are deemed more important than providing vulnerable elders with the care they need and deserve. Residents and families are powerless to change the system to which they have fallen victim.
It’s time to take a closer look at this tragic and completely unacceptable state of affairs, demand research into the nature and prevalence of neglect and abuse in long-term care, and most important, to immediately implement steps stop it. Class action suits such as the one described in the article at the link after the quote below are a step in the right direction.
“Understaffed, over worked, too much money being wasted on administration that should be going to to staff/ and patient care. Most places look great, but when you go to visit at off times, unannounced, conditions are totally different.” Reader comment on: Class action accuses one of Canada’s biggest nursing-home companies of neglecting residents
Image copyright: warrengoldswain / 123RF Stock Photo