Advocacy, NHBPS, Toward better care

being heard will make you think differently

Sonya Barsness defines herself as a “revisionary gerontologist.”

A revisionist, she writes in the “about” part of her blog, is “an advocate of revision; a reviser; any advocate of doctrines, theories, or practices that depart from established authority or doctrine.”

“Revisionist historians re-interpret historical records or events. As a revisionist gerontologist I believe we need to change the paradigm of aging and dementia,” she says.

I couldn’t agree more — we ABSOLUTELY need to change the paradigm of aging and dementia. And I love Barsness’s blog “being heard.” She posts relatively infrequently, which is a good thing for people like me who are snowed under with emails, and when she does post, you can be sure the piece is something well worth reading, like this one entitled “The Faces of BPSD.”

Take a look. Have a listen. I bet being heard will make you think differently too…

take off the blindfolds and #BanBPSD: an open letter to the worldwide dementia community

7 problems with BPSD

the broken lens of BPSD: why we need to rethink the way we label the behaviour of people who live with alzheimer’s disease

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my short survey on behaviour here.

Advocacy, Antipsychotic drugs, NHBPS, Toward better care

20 compelling reasons to rethink the way we label and medicalise the behaviour of people who live with dementia #BanBPSD

In June this year, I posted an open letter to the worldwide dementia care community. Since then, advocates and activists such as myself, including Dr. Al PowerDaniela GreenwoodHoward GordonLiz LesterLeah BisianiSonya Barsness, Dr. Chris Alderman, Kate Swaffer, and others, have joined forces to create an awareness and action campaign calling for the ban of the damaging and stigmatizing artificial construct BPSD (the short form of “behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia).

As part of the campaign, fellow human rights and dementia care advocate Kate Swaffer penned “Rethinking Dementia: Normal Human Responses,” an excellent post wherein she lists fourteen simple examples of why we should #BanBPSD. Here are five from Kate’s list of 14 [I’ve added bits here and there, which I have enclosed in square brackets]:

I would add these six to Kate’s list of 14:

15 ) Labeling, medicalising and punishing normal human responses to being told to sit or stay still for long periods of time is abuse. Most people (75 per cent) say they would start to feel restless if made to sit longer than half an hour.

16 ) Labeling, medicalising and punishing normal human human bodily functions is cruel and abusive.

17 ) Labeling, medicalising and punishing an individual’s lifelong normal behaviour is cruel and abusive.

18 ) Labeling, medicalising and punishing an individual’s normal human responses to inadequate care, harmful environmental conditions and being restrained is cruel, abusive and wrong.

19 ) Labeling, medicalising and punishing an individual’s normal human responses to cruel, abusive, harmful and wrongful treatment by physically restraining them is abuse.

20 ) Labeling, medicalising and punishing an invidivual’s normal human responses to cruel, abusive, harmful and wrongful treatment by chemically restraining them is abuse and should be made criminal.

I highly recommend reading the full text of Kate’s excellent piece here, and I invite to also read my article “the broken lens of BPSD: why we need to rethink the way we label the behaviour of people who live with alzheimer’s disease,” which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

#IAmChallengingBehaviour #BanBPSD #WeCanCareBetter

take off the blindfolds and #BanBPSD: an open letter to the worldwide dementia community

7 problems with BPSD

the broken lens of BPSD: why we need to rethink the way we label the behaviour of people who live with alzheimer’s disease

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my short survey on behaviour here.

Image copyright: olegdudko / 123RF Stock Photo

Advocacy, Antipsychotic drugs, Information, NHBPS

take off the blindfolds and #BanBPSD: an open letter to the worldwide dementia community

This is an open letter to members of the dementia community worldwide.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear dementia educators, researchers, geriatric professionals, Alzheimer’s societies, associations, and organizations, and members of the worldwide dementia care community,

My mother spent most of the last four years of her life in a catatonic state because the people who were meant to care for her were blind.

They were blind because of what they had been taught. Teachers, trainers, supervisors and peers had told them Alzheimer disease causes the people who live with it to “wander,” “become aggressive,” “try to escape,” and “resist care,” among 101 other things. Unfortunately, when people who live with dementia (PLWD) respond in reasonable ways to adverse conditions and circumstances (RRACC), their actions are labelled “behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia,” or BPSD, despite the fact that what they do is perfectly normal under the circumstances and in most cases has little if anything to do with dementia.

The care workers, nurses and even the facility physician who were supposed to ensure my mom’s well-being didn’t understand that she responded to being in pain, or being hot, cold, tired, sick, confined, restrained, neglected, wet, hungry, bombarded with noise or being told what to do and when by becoming distressed, just as any “normal” person would. The carers, nurses and physician couldn’t see the real causes of my mother’s distress and subsequent actions because they were blindfolded by the notion of BPSD.

Like my mom was, hundreds of thousands of PLWD are stigmatized, misunderstood, drugged, neglected and abused every day because of ignorance. The vast majority of people in dementia research and care, regardless of their area of practice, want the best for PLWD. They want PLWD to lead healthy, engaged and purposeful lives, despite dementia. The majority don’t want PLWD to be drugged, neglected and abused. But, like those who were supposed to care for my mom, their collective ability to see clearly, and do what’s best is either impaired by the broken lens of BPSD, or made impossible by a BPSD blindfold.

It’s time members of the dementia care community worldwide saw the light.

BPSD is an umbrella term devised by the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) in the late 1990s. Its roots lie in the work of researcher Dr. Jiska Cohen-Mansfield, who, a decade earlier developed a 29-item scale to measure agitation in nursing home residents. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a research tool that is not designed to determine the causes of agitation (dementia or otherwise), it merely measures it. In the late 1990s, the IPA renamed these indicators of agitation, and proclaimed that henceforth they should be called BPSD, thereby morphing a cluster of research tools into a clinical tool.

The first two iterations of the IPA’s BPSD Educational Pack were “produced by the IPA under an educational grant provided by Janssen-Cilag,” a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer and distributor of risperidone, which is marketed under the brand name Risperdal, and which was subsequently sold as a treatment for BPSD. Risperidone and other antipsychotics such as quetiapine (Seroquel) and haloperidol (Haldol) are still prescribed to PLWD despite being contraindicated for anything other than a diagnosis of psychosis and “black boxed” in the USA and other countries.

Labelling the reasonable responses of PLWD as symptoms of dementia may be good for the bottom line of pharmaceutical companies, but it’s harmful to PLWD and their carers. It causes care partners, care workers, and medical personnel to misinterpret the actions of PLWD, which in turn causes dementia carers to fail to look for, and therefore identify the true causes of distress in PLWD, as well as to inappropriately use antipsychotics and physical restraints that are counterproductive and largely ineffective in addressing the issue.

Even the most skilled and knowledgeable dementia care practitioners, researchers and educators may find it hard to escape the BPSD trap. For example, I recently came across the NHS Dementia Best Practice Guide, which was written under the direction of Professor Alistair Burns, National Clinical Director for Dementia in England, for the UK’s NHS, and Professor Clive Ballard, Pro-Vice-Chancellor and Executive Dean, University of Exeter Medical School. Besides providing information, the guide emphasises “alternatives to drug treatments,” which, as a advocate against the inappropriate use of antipsychotics, I unequivocally and unreservedly support.

The list of researchers, educators, and clinicians on the guide’s advisory board reads like a UK dementia care who’s who, some of whom are highly (and visibly) committed to changing the way PLWD are perceived and treated. Here is advisory board member Dr. Dawn Brooker sharing her views at the World Health Organisation’s Global Dementia Conference in 2015:

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

All of this begs the question: why is the NHS Dementia Best Practice Guide entitled “Optimising treatment and care for people with behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia”? Don’t these dementia care leaders and pioneers know that BPSD are not symptoms of dementia? Well, yes. Apparently they do, as the guide content demonstrates. The statements in bold that follow are taken directly from the guide, which says, for example:

A screen shot from the NHS guide

“Pain is one of the most common causes of BPSD.”

If this is true, then a PLWD’s reasonable response to pain is a behavioural and psychological symptom of experiencing pain, not of living with dementia. If, when the pain is addressed, the symptoms disappear, then the symptoms are a result of the pain, not of dementia, which remains after the pain is relieved. This same logic applies to all the “triggers” in the guide.

Recognition of triggers and early signs (e.g. pain, discomfort, malnourishment, dehydration, boredom, physical illness, increased levels of distress, signs of abuse or neglect) that may precede behavioural and psychological symptoms is crucial.”

If a “trigger” is the cause, dementia is not. The possible factors that may cause a PLWD to respond as most human beings would include those mentioned in the guide as well as dozens of others. Any person, whether she has dementia or not, would exhibit some kind of “behaviour” if she were experiencing the “triggers” in the guide. If a PLWD responds to these conditions in ways that those around them find challenging, then their response is a behavioural and/or psychological symptom of being hungry, uncomfortable, malnourished, bored, ill, distressed, abused, neglected, etc., NOT of dementia.

“In most cases developing simple approaches to address these early signs can help prevent symptoms from developing at all.”

Of course they can! If the cause is addressed, the symptoms won’t develop because the symptoms are not symptoms of dementia, they are the result of whatever the real causes are, which, if alleviated, will resolve the issue. A circular argument to be sure, but valid nonetheless.

“Sudden emergence of BPSD often has a physical trigger.”

In other words, the physical triggers listed in the guide (i.e. pressure sores, loud noise, being restrained, not being able to see, not being able to hear, being to hot or too cold or hungry) are likely to cause a PLWD to react somehow, just as the same conditions would cause anyone to react in some way whether they live with dementia or not.

Likewise, a June 2018 article in The Aging Agenda (Non-drug approaches lead to ‘massive decreases’ in BPSD) quotes Associate Professor Stephen Macfarlane, head of clinical services at Dementia Support Australia (DSA), who provided irrefutable proof that BPSD are NOT SYMPTOMS OF DEMENTIA.

In 2015, the government of Australia established Severe Behaviour Response Teams (SBRT) which are operated by DSA. The Aging Agenda article reports that: “An analysis of 173 SBRT cases over three months found severe behaviours were reduced by 50 per cent and their severity reduced by 66 per cent. There was also a 70 per cent decrease in the level of distress in aged care workers and a slight decrease in psychotropic drug use.”

So, by using “behavioural, psychological and environmental interventions,” not drugs, the SBRT were able to reduce the actions of PLWD that care workers find challenging by 50 per cent, and, at the same time, reduce the care workers’ level of distress by 70 per cent. This is HUGE, and proves once again and without a doubt that BPSD are not symptoms of dementia.

Equally important, the SBRT and the DSA determined that 70 per cent of the instances in which PLWD acted in ways that care workers found challenging were the result of the PLWD being in pain.

“Given that such a high proportion of behaviours are contributed to by pain and by the impact of an incorrect or inappropriate carer approach, the solutions to those dilemmas lie in the hands of residential [care workers],” Associate Professor Macfarlane said, according to the article.

This means that in most cases, the things that PLWD do that care partners and care workers find challenging are behavioural and psychological symptoms of pain and/or an incorrect or inappropriate carer approach. These findings echo those of the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement’s pan-Canadian collaborative conducted in 2014/15, and my own research of 2016/17/18, the results of which are hereherehere, and here.

It defies belief that members of the dementia community worldwide continue to erroneously attribute the reasonable reactions of PLWD to dementia when the evidence that they are not BPSD is widely available, undeniable, and overwhelming.

How many studies confirming what is common sense will it take for people to stop using the harmful artificial construct of BPSD? How long will it take for dementia educators, researchers, geriatric professionals, Alzheimer’s societies, associations, and organizations, and members of the worldwide dementia care community to open their collective eyes, fix their broken lenses, take off their blindfolds and see the light?

What can individuals and organizations that are part of the dementia community do to shift this paradigm?

Here are six ideas for starters:

1 ) People who publish guides and information such as the NHS Dementia Best Practice Guide, could #BanBPSD from their language and publications. Leaders such Professor Alistair Burns, Professor Clive Ballard, and the advisory board that worked with them on the guide could have the title changed to reflect the basic truths in the guide’s content.

2) The Alzheimer’s Society in Canada could update their November 2017 language guidelines, which are excellent, and add BPSD to the list of terms that should not be used.

3 ) Dementia Support Australia could rewrite its page on “behaviour” to reflect what it has proven through the SBRT project — that pain and inappropriate care approaches, not dementia, are the causes of behaviour that challenges carers.

4 ) Researchers could stop researching BPSD, and instead focus their efforts on the real causes of distress in PLWD, or better yet, research ways to address the causes and reduce the distress.

5 ) The International Psychogeriatric Association, which first coined the term BPSD, could do us all a favour and step into the 21st century. It could redefine the way it characterizes dementia and the people who live with it to align the IPA with the evidence instead of clinging to an artificial construct and continuing to support a myth whose primary beneficiary is the pharmaceutical industry.

6 ) Everyone, especially clinicians and other medical professionals in the dementia space worldwide could #BanBPSD from their own language as well as from the larger dementia lexicon from today onwards.

As a member of the worldwide dementia community, you can take action right now:

Reject the harmful artificial construct of BPSD
Share this post with your colleagues, your communities, care workers, care partners and across social media
Use the hashtag #BanBPSD.

Help me and other advocates create a better world for people who live with dementia and their carers.

Thank you,

Susan Macaulay,
Dementia Care Advocate
Blogger, author, former care partner

101 potential causes of behaviour by people living with dementia that institutional care staff may find challenging

7 problems with BPSD

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my short survey on behaviour here.

Image copyright: bowie15 / 123RF Stock Photo

Advocacy, Challenges & Solutions, NHBPS, Toward better care

hundreds of studies make me mad as hell

I am frustrated by the fact that what is self-evident to me (and to thousands of other family care partners) appears to be a mystery to care providers, and apparently also to a whole whack of policy and decision makers who seem to require untold quantities of expensive research to confirm that which is as plain as day to dementia care advocates worldwide. Maybe someone should research why we need research to prove what is common sense and what dementia care advocates already know.

A team of 14 researchers at the University of Exeter in the UK likely spent a year or two working on this paper: Living well with dementia: a systematic review and correlational meta-analysis of factors associated with quality of life, well-being and life satisfaction in people with dementia, which was published in January 2018 in Psychological Medicine; see a layperson’s version in ScienceDaily here.

The team looked at research that spanned four decades and produced a 10-page report that came to a seven-line conclusion, which reads in part:

“Our findings suggest that efforts to improve QoL might focus on supporting relationships, social engagement and everyday functioning, addressing poor physical and mental health, and ensuring high-quality care.”

This is news?

According to the abstract, the conclusions were based on the analysis of “198 QoL studies taken from 272 articles in the meta-analysis.” It boggles my mind when I think about the amounts of money and effort that went into all those studies to come to the conclusion that people with dementia need the same things to enjoy a reasonable quality of life as people who don’t live with dementia. Hello! People who live with dementia are people, not aliens.

Wikihow gives a great list of five personal quality of life indicators for regular folk that include those in the Exeter study conclusion plus several others; here they are:

  • Quality of living conditions
  • Access to healthcare and education
  • Feelings of safety and security
  • Social interactions and relationships
  • Sense of purpose and meaning

Naomi Feil suggested a similar set of needs in her 1993 book The Validation Breakthrough, and of course there’s the person-centered model proposed by Tom Kitwood in the late 1990s, and the well-being model more recently outlined by Dr. Al Power in Dementia Beyond Disease: Enhancing Well-Being, which all say something similar in different ways.

The second half of the Exeter study’s conclusion calls for more research; it says:

“However, there is a need for longitudinal evidence that can point to ways of maintaining or improving QoL over time and enable identification of people at risk of declining QoL, so that preventive interventions can be targeted to this group.”

With all due respect to the researchers, I don’t think we need more research. We need better dementia care.

I think we need to immediately implement action plans that will transform substandard conditions in long-term care facilities and in our own communities to bring them up to acceptable levels. We need to put frameworks and programs in place that will ensure that the majority of people living with dementia attain a reasonable quality of life, whether they live in their own homes or in institutions. We are still a long way from that goal. We need to attain it before we have to maintain it!

The challenges and circumstances under which hundreds of thousands of people who live with dementia struggle every day preclude them from living well and enjoying a reasonable quality of life. These deplorable conditions include being misunderstood, stigmatized, vilified, neglected and abused, as well as being physically confined and chemically restrained, among other indignities.

It makes me mad as hell, and even more determined to be a creator of change.

#wecancarebetter

13+ needs we share with people who live with dementia

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my second short survey on behaviour here.

Advocacy, Challenges & Solutions, NHBPS, Toward better care

how would we behave if we were locked in? research shows 96% of us would respond the same way many people with dementia do

I remain astonished that the vast majority of geriatricians, gerontologists, neurologists, and other medical geriatrics professionals persist in using the artificial construct of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) to describe the behaviours of people who live with dementia (PLWD) that care partners and care workers experience as challenging when it is ridiculously easy to prove (even I can do it), that such behaviour is normal under the circumstances in which PLWD find themselves.

In 2016, I created “a short survey on behaviour” and invited people to respond. The survey remains open online, and the results are consistent over time; as of May 7, 2018, 1,555 people had responded. Based on that piece of lay research alone, the only possible conclusion is that BPSD are not symptoms of dementia.

However, I am determined to gather more evidence to support my case; my goal is to stop the use of the erroneous and harmful label BPSD.

In April 2018, I created another survey (Is it normal?) related specifically to “wandering” and “exit-seeking behaviour.” As of May 7, 2018, 510 people had responded; I expect the results will be consistent over time, just as they are with “A short survey on behaviour.” It’s important to note that 90 per cent of the “Is it normal?” survey respondents indicated that, as far as they know, they do not have any form of dementia. Therefore, behaviour that 90 per cent of the respondents imagine they might exhibit under particular sets of circumstances (i.e. being trapped in their own home), could not be attributed to dementia.

A preliminary analysis of the responses to Question 6 (How would you feel/react if you were unable to leave your home when you wanted to because for some strange/unknown reason you couldn’t find the doors or, if you could find them, you couldn’t open them when you did?) may be found here.

Question 7, also an open-ended question, expands on Question 6; it asks respondents to imagine what they might do in a situation faced every day by many people who live with dementia and who exhibit what is labelled as “elopement,” trying to “escape/flee,” and/or “exit seeking” behaviour. Question 7 asks: “If you couldn’t find or open the doors to leave your home when you wanted to, what might you do? What action (if any) might you take?”

Of the 510 people who had taken the survey as of May 7, 2018, a total of 466 responded to Question 7. Here are some examples of their answers:

  • Call the watchman, call my neighbor, call my office, call my best friend. Open the windows, get on the balcony shout to someone to get help. If all fails, I could string some bed sheets on the balcony rail and slide down.
  • Try to smash my way out with something
  • Call out for help, ask people what to do, how to get out. Try to open the doors, look around for another way out. Enlist others to help. Plan a prison break. Call on the phone for help. I’d become very agitated, impatient, distrustful, restless, anxious and maybe fearful.
  • Jump out of the window
  • Look for another way out, i.e. A window, call a friend, call 911, scream out for HELP so that someone outside can hear me and help me find a way out.

To facilitate analysis, I grouped the 446 responses into six categories:

  1. Try to get help (e.g. call, ring, phone, shout, scream, yell, holler, ask, beg for help)
  2. Try to get out (e.g. climb, search, find a way out, break, smash, saw, hammer, kick, cut)
  3. Get emotional (e.g. panic, become upset, become angry, freak out, frantic, go bonkers)
  4. Don’t know (i.e. don’t know, not sure, can’t imagine)
  5. Withdraw (i.e curl up, sleep, go to bed, wait, shut down, withdraw)
  6. Do stuff (there are only two responses in this category: 1) Need to find activities to occupy myself; and 2) Do the jobs I’ve been putting off)

Here’s a graph showing the categories, as well as the percentage and number of responses in each category:

Virtually all of the ways respondents said they would react (i.e. categories 1, 2, 3, and 5) would be labelled BPSD (using the medical model). However, of the 466 respondents who answered Question 7, only 11 (2.3 per cent) said they had some form of dementia. That means a little less than 98 per cent of those who responded to question 7 either do not have dementia, or don’t know if they have it or not.

Also, of the 160 people who said they would try to escape in one way or another, slightly more than half (i.e. 87) said they would break, smash, or kick their way out.

Note: 444 of the 446 people who responded to this question identified as female.

The bottom line? Only the people who answered either “Don’t know” (n=18) or that they would “do stuff” (n=2), imagined that they would not exhibit some form of what would be labelled BPSD. That means that about 96 per cent of the respondents felt they would exhibit some form of so-called BPSD even though they don’t have dementia!

As this survey shows, when a human being is locked in and feels trapped:

Many of the behaviours that are labelled BPSD, are normal human responses to feeling or being trapped and/or threatened. What we name behaviours hugely impacts how we see and interpret them. It’s time to examine the wording of BPSD as it stands. Many of these behaviours are human responses to unmet physical, emotional and/or psychosocial needs; responses that can easily be seen as normal in the light of feeling threatened or fearful.

It’s time to reframe behavioral expressions in ways that enable us to identify their root causes and, in turn, inform improved efforts to implement humane, personalized, and effective approaches for the care of PLWD. Seniors with dementia need to be better understood and compassionately cared for, not drugged and managed to fit the constraints of a broken system.

Take the survey here.

101 potential causes of behaviour by people living with dementia that institutional care staff may find challenging

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my second short survey on behaviour here.

Image copyright: blanarum / 123RF Stock Photo

Advocacy, Challenges & Solutions, NHBPS, Toward better care

how would “normal” people feel if we did to them what we do to people who live with dementia?

The more research I do, the more proof I have that the behaviours of some people who live with dementia that challenge those around them are not the result of dementia, but rather perfectly reasonable reactions to particular sets of circumstances.

In early 2017, I began an anonymous online “survey” that is both a learning tool, and a way for me to show that behaviours labelled “BPSD” are in fact normal human behaviours. You may take that survey here; you may see the results here, or in this article published in the Journal of the American medical Directors Association (JAMDA).

I started my second anonymous ongoing online survey on April 11, 2018. The vast majority of the respondent (93%) answered an open-ended question which asked how they would feel when faced with a situation that every person who lives with dementia in a “memory care unit” and others in their own homes potentially face every day.

The question asks how respondents would feel if they could not leave their living space when they wanted to because they could either not find a door, or the door(s) would not open. Of those who responded to the question, two (2) say they would remain calm; four (4) say they couldn’t imagine what they might feel.

The other 98% say they would become distressed in some way. They describe how they would feel using words such as:

  • scared/frightened/afraid/terrified (25%)
  • anxious/upset/agitated (24%)
  • trapped/claustrophobic/imprisoned (22%)
  • frustrated (20%)
  • panicked/panicky/panic (18%)

As well as others such as angry, confused, disoriented, helpless, cross, annoyed, and crazy. Many use multiple word answers; for example:

  • Trapped, a prisoner in my own home.
  • Confused, upset, suspicious, anxious, angry, frustrated, depressed, imprisoned.
  • I would be extremely upset, panicky, angry and disoriented.
  • Angry. Upset. Confused.
  • I would became frustrated, agitated, and probably angry.
  • Terrified! Confused! Helpless! Frustrated! Angry! Embarrassed! Desperate!
  • I would freak out. Total meltdown. Panic.

Of the people who have participated in the survey to date, 89% say they do not have dementia. Therefore, their reaction to being “locked in” cannot be a result of dementia.

We’ve got it all wrong when we lock up people who live with dementia in their own homes or in memory care units, and then blame dementia for their anxiety and upset. As people who live with dementia are human, they react the same way the rest of us would if we were unable to leave our living space — they feel frightened, anxious, frustrated, trapped, panicky, angry, and confused. I experienced it first hand with my mom when I didn’t know any better.

It boggles my mind that an astonishing number of medical professionals in the area of dementia care seem not to “get it.” It’s not rocket science folks. We just need to walk a mile in their shoes.

Take the survey here.

how would we behave if we were locked in? research shows 96% of us would respond the same way many people with dementia do

“wandering” is not a symptom of dementia

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my second short survey on behaviour here.

Advocacy, Antipsychotic drugs, NHBPS, Toward better care

20 questions to ask when a person living with dementia declines to take her or his medication

Care partners and care staff may become frustrated when someone who lives with dementia declines to take medications that care partners and care staff believe are beneficial for the person living with dementia.

If you are one of those care partners or care staff, asking yourself these 20 questions might help address that frustration, and give you a different perspective on why people with dementia might choose to decline taking medication.

  1. Do I know why I’m giving this person this medication in this dose at this time?
  2. Is the medication necessary? If it was necessary before, is it still? Has that been tested for in some way recently (e.g. by slowly lowering the dose)? If it hasn’t, should it be?
  3. Could the dosage be reduced? Could the medication be eliminated completely?
  4. What are the risks associated with this medication? What are the benefits? Do the benefits outweigh the risks? Or do the risks outweigh the benefits?
  5. What are the consequences if a dose is missed? What are the consequences if a dose is delayed? Do the benefits of skipping or delaying a dose outweigh the risks?
  6. Have I researched non-pharmacological ways to address whatever issue the medication is meant to address? Have I tried them? If so, what happened? If they “failed,” did I ask myself why? Have I tried non-pharmacological means a second time? Have I tried them repeatedly?
  7. What would I do if someone tried to give me drugs I didn’t want or need and/or that made me feel funny, sleepy or ill? How would I feel if a stranger tried to give me pills and I didn’t know what they were?
  8. What are the side effects of the medication? Have I read and do I understand the information sheet for this particular drug? Do I know how this drug interacts with others? What are the contraindications?
  9. What obvious effect or effects does the medication have on the person I’m giving it too? If I don’t know what the effects are for this person in particular, when can I make time to observe the effects carefully? What effect or effects might the medication have that may not be immediately visible or obvious to me?
  10. Could the medication be interacting in a negative way with other medications the person is taking or foods she or he is eating such as grapefruit for example?
  11. Have I considered the fact that taking the medication may cause the person distress or discomfort?
  12. In the past, have I regularly asked the person how she or he feels after she or he has taken the medication? Have I asked after the drug is meant to have taken effect?
  13. Does the medication taste bad, look bad or smell bad? Is the medication hard to swallow? Does it feel funny (e.g. stinging, hot, or cold) going down?
  14. How do I react when people order me to do things I don’t want to do or that I know will have negative consequences for me? How do I react when people think they know better than I do what’s best for me? How do I feel when people try to control me, tell me what to do or treat me like a child?
  15. How do strong medications affect me when I take them? How does it feel when I have adverse effects from taking medicine?
  16. Is taking medicine something I generally look forward to? Or is it something I would prefer not to do, but I do it because I have to under “doctors orders”?
  17. Would I want to take drugs that put me to sleep or made me feel anxious or nauseous or produced other unpleasand effects?
  18. How do I feel about taking medication in general? Do I think it’s a good thing or a bad thing? How does the person I’m giving the medication to feel about taking medicine in general?
  19. When and why have I taken medicine? How does being ill cause me to feel? Do I usually feel comfortable or uncomfortable? Do I tend to be happy and cheerful, or otherwise?
  20. Have I ever stopped talking a medication that’s been prescribed for me because I didn’t think it was working, or I didn’t like the way it made me feel, or I just felt I should stop for no particular reason?

How did you answer question 14? If you are like 94% of the 1,300+ people who have answered my short survey on behaviour, you would refuse to take drugs you didn’t want to take (as shown in the graph below). Think about that the next time a person who is living with dementia chooses not to take the drugs you want to give them.

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my short survey on behaviour here.

Image copyright: bialasiewicz / 123RF Stock Photo

Advocacy, Antipsychotic drugs, NHBPS, Toward better care

10 ways to reframe “refused medication”

These happy antipsychotic meds are saying “Bye bye people who live with dementia, you’re much better off without us!”

We often use pejorative words to describe that which we don’t like in others. We label behaviours that challenge us, don’t fit with our agenda, interfere with our routines or are inconvenient to us in some way or another as “bad,” particularly if those behaving in the way we don’t approve live with dementia in institutional environments.

When they “resist care,” “wander,” or “complain” their “bad” behaviours are recorded and tracked in charts by nurses and care staff like so many black marks, which, if and when there are enough of them, may lead to the offender being “punished” by, for example, being physically restrained and/or chemically restrained, which in turn may lead her or him to incur more infractions such as “trying to escape,” or “refusing medication.”

I believe we have to stop this cycle by reframing how we think about the behaviour of people who live with dementia. I’ve already suggested lots of alternatives for wanderer and wandering.

Here are some potential replacements for “refused [antipsychotic] medication,” which I hope medical professionals and long-term care facility staff will take time to think about:

  1. Respectfully declined
  2. Wished to remain himself
  3. Exercised her right to choose
  4. Preferred to keep her wits about her
  5. Wanted to be awake instead of sleeping
  6. Wished to avoid unpleasant side effects
  7. Preferred to be alert rather than catatonic
  8. Wanted to engage life and live longer & better
  9. Refused to put herself at increased risk of falls
  10. Wanted to have control instead of to be controlled

In case you think I’m being over the top and/or silly about this, please take a moment to reflect on what you would do if someone tried to make you take drugs you didn’t want to take. If you are like 94% of the 1,300+ people who have answered my short survey on behaviour, you would decline to take them. #justsaying

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

Take my short survey on behaviour here.

Image copyright: lenm / 123RF Stock Photo

Advocacy, Antipsychotic drugs, NHBPS

how much is lost in translation?

This is one in a series of vignettes based on the Nursing Home Behaviour Problem Scale (NHBPS), which is used to measure agitation in people who live with dementiaThe vignettes, which are fictionalized versions of real events, are told from the point of view and in the voice of a fictional character called Annie, a woman in her mid-eighties who lives with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type in the mid- to later-stages of the disease. Annie resides in a long-term care facility somewhere in Canada. This vignette is called “lost in translation.” The rest of the vignettes are here.

Teepa thin banner

lost in translation

“I’m thirsty,” I say to the young man. “I’d like a cup of tea please.”

“What’s that Annie?” He replies. He puts a plate in front of me. It has three different colours of mashed potatoes on it: one white, one dark brown, and one green.

“I said ‘I’m thirsty, and I’d like a cup of tea please,’” I repeat.

“I can’t make head nor tail of your gobbledygook Annie,” the young man says. Now he’s putting a plate in front of the old lady beside me. Her plate also has white, brown and green mashed potatoes on it. “What does: ‘no water dry, the teabag late came,’ mean Annie?” he says.

What’s he talking about? It doesn’t make sense. His words are all jumbled up and out of order. The people in this place are very strange, it’s like they’re from another planet.

“I want some tea please,” I say again.

“Sorry Annie, I just can’t understand what you want,” the young man says.

Better to keep quiet. I try to sit still, but I feel restless. And I know what happens when I move around or complain – I get it trouble. I don’t want to get in trouble. I feel sad. I feel mad. I wish I could get out of here. I want to go home to my mom. She’ll take care of me. I hope someone will bring me a cup of tea.

“Hi Mom.” It’s the silver-haired girl. I don’t know where she came from, but I’m glad to see her.

“Hi dear,” I say. I like the silver-haired girl.

“I see you’re having lunch Mom. It smells like it might be chicken” she says. “And those might be peas. With mashed potatoes.”

“Chicken,” I say. “Maybe it’s chicken.” It doesn’t look like chicken.

“Are you thirsty, Mom?” The silver-haired girl says.

“Yes,” I say. I don’t tell her I’ve just told the young man, but he didn’t understand me.

“I bet you’d like something to drink eh Mom?”

“Something to drink,” I say.

“How about some tea Mom?” The silver-haired girl smiles. She has pink lipstick on.

“Te te te te te tea party?” I say. I don’t know why I stutter, but sometimes I do.

“Yeah,” the silver-haired girl smiles. Her eyes look at me. They’re blue, and crinkly at the corners. “Tea for two and two for tea.” She’s singing now.

Tea party. “That would be nice,” I say. “Tea party would be nice.”

“Okay Mom, I’ll get you some tea.” The silver-haired girl stands up.

I wish everyone were like her. She’s just like my Mummy.

©2017 Susan Macaulay / MyAlzheimersStory.com

alzheimer annie invites you in

please remain seated for the rest of your life

look who’s talking now

 

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

//s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.mailchimp.com/js/mc-validate.js(function($) {window.fnames = new Array(); window.ftypes = new Array();fnames[0]=’EMAIL’;ftypes[0]=’email’;fnames[1]=’FNAME’;ftypes[1]=’text’;fnames[2]=’LNAME’;ftypes[2]=’text’;}(jQuery));var $mcj = jQuery.noConflict(true);
Image copyright: bowie15 / 123RF Stock Photo

 

Challenges & Solutions, NHBPS, Toward better care

101 potential causes of behaviour by people living with dementia that institutional care staff may find challenging

While researching my second JAMDA article, I came across a relatively recent paper by Dr. Jiska Cohen-Mansfield on the causes of discomfort in people who live with dementia (PLWD) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Cohen-Mansfield and her team developed a Sources of Discomfort Scale (SODS), as part of a larger study for the “Treatment Routes for Exploring Agitation” (TREA). The SODS lists the 20 most common sources of discomfort the researchers discovered, of which the top four are:

  1. feeling tired or sleepy
  2. sitting for too long
  3. being restrained
  4. inadequate lighting

This caused me to revisit my list of 35 things that may cause people with dementia (and you) to become uncooperative, upset, angry, anxious or “aggressive,” which I then found inadequate. Somewhere else (I don’t remember where now), I had come across the concept of separating sources of discomfort and agitation under four broad categories:

  • physical discomfort
  • psychological discomfort
  • social discomfort
  • environmental factors

Like Dr. Cohen-Mansfield, I continue to explore the root causes of the of the reasonable reactions people living with dementia have to the circumstance in which they find themselves. These reasonable reactions are also sometimes called behavioural expressions, responsive behaviours, personal expressions and, unhelpfully, “challenging behaviours.” “The broken lens of BPSD: why we need to rethink the way we label the behaviour of people who live with alzheimer’s disease” gives specific examples drawn from my personal experience of how the biomedical model misses the mark when it comes to identifying the causes of behavioural expressions in PLWD.

Based on my own experience and observations, I developed this list of 101 possible underlying reasons for the responsive behaviours of PLWD in LTCFs, grouped into the four broad categories mentioned above:

Physical discomfort (33)
  1. pain
  2. constipation
  3. incontinence
  4. forced incontinence (needing help with toileting, but no help available)
  5. being wet / soiled
  6. being assaulted
  7. being neglected and/or abused
  8. feeling hot
  9. feeling cold
  10. fatigue
  11. exhaustion
  12. hunger
  13. thirst
  14. breathing difficulties
  15. hearing problems (helpful downloadable PDF by Agnes Houston MBE)
  16. vision problems (helpful downloadable PDF by Agnes Houston MBE)
  17. sensory issues (helpful downloadable PDF by Agnes Houston MBE)
  18. reaction to food (e.g. caffeine)
  19. stomach upset
  20. being restrained
  21. dry skin
  22. itchiness
  23. poor diet
  24. malnutrition
  25. ill-fitting clothes
  26. insufficient bathing
  27. lack of exercise
  28. weakness
  29. illness (e.g. various infections including UTIs)
  30. inability to verbally communicate (e.g. aphasia)
  31. being denied touch
  32. unmet sexual needs
  33. experiencing the side effects of medications (e.g. risperidone, quetiapine,) and/or polypharmacy
Psychological discomfort (36)
  1. fear
  2. confusion
  3. frustration
  4. boredom
  5. loneliness
  6. shame
  7. depression
  8. despair
  9. hopelessness
  10. grief
  11. loss
  12. humiliation
  13. isolation
  14. lack of love
  15. lack of attention
  16. feeling out of control
  17. feeling incompetent
  18. feeling unheard
  19. feeling worried
  20. feeling panicky
  21. feeling powerless
  22. being a “stranger in a strange land”
  23. being restrained/denied one’s freedom of movement or voice
  24. being told what to do
  25. being neglected
  26. being abused
  27. not getting to do what one wants
  28. too much stimulation
  29. too little stimulation
  30. too much routine
  31. too little routine
  32. life changes
  33. being purposeless
  34. being denied pleasure and play
  35. anxiety (as a result of all of the above and below)
  36. feeling angry (as a result of all of the above and below)
Social discomfort (16)
  1. having strange people all around
  2. being in close quarters with others
  3. being isolated
  4. being punished
  5. being ridiculed
  6. being bullied
  7. too much social stimulation
  8. too little social stimulation
  9. forced activity
  10. forced inactivity
  11. being denied access to loved ones
  12. being patronized
  13. being infantilized
  14. being shamed
  15. being embarrassed
  16. being forced to interact with people one doesn’t like
Environmental factors (16)
  1. noise  (also: helpful downloadable PDF by Agnes Houston MBE)
  2. unknown sounds
  3. loud sounds
  4. radio / television
  5. too much light
  6. too little light
  7. heat
  8. cold
  9. clutter
  10. uninteresting surroundings
  11. unfamiliar surroundings
  12. change in surroundings
  13. being confined to a small space
  14. being confined indoors
  15. stale air / lack of ventilation
  16. lack of sun

This list isn’t exhaustive. To add to it, ask yourself what would make you feel uncomfortable, anxious, unwilling to cooperate, angry, “combative,” and/or upset. Correctly identifying the root cause of behavioural expressions that are problematic for care workers and LTCF staff can help us find solutions other than inappropriately medicating people with antipsychotic drugs.

the broken lens of BPSD: why we need to rethink the way we label the behaviour of people who live with alzheimer’s disease

20 questions that help explain why people with dementia get agitated and physically aggressive

See also:

https://kateswaffer.com/2018/09/10/30-normal-human-responses-6/

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

Subscribe to MAS now & get 5 free PDFs & a page of welcome links:

Email Address

//s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.mailchimp.com/js/mc-validate.js(function($) {window.fnames = new Array(); window.ftypes = new Array();fnames[0]=’EMAIL’;ftypes[0]=’email’;fnames[1]=’FNAME’;ftypes[1]=’text’;fnames[2]=’LNAME’;ftypes[2]=’text’;}(jQuery));var $mcj = jQuery.noConflict(true);

Image copyright: anyka / 123RF Stock Photo